Here is a chart of GBPCAD. Price is in a strong up trend, following a regular Andrews pitchfork.
Now, price has reached the lower parallel of the median line. What is it going to do next? It breaches the lower parallel but somehow manages to return back within the fork.
The question everyone asks at that point is "Is the fork still working?" or "Is the trend still up? We usually draw an outer sliding parallel at the last lowest low and see what happens next. But... oops! Price is going down again, breaking below the sliding parallel, but again it is unable to stay below it.
So, what do we do next? Do we draw yet another sliding parallel at the low? Or is it already a down trend? Don't we have lower highs and lower lows? Let's add a down fork to see what the bearish trend might look like.
As a sidenote, we also notice we're at a psychological level of 1.80000. As new candles develop, we see that price doesn't seem to be able to close below that level.
Price respects the sliding parallel and doesn't make much progress to the down side, esp. with regard to the highs. Price keeps developing in a horizontal range, making no progress in terms of both the up fork and the down fork.
It develops that way until it reaches the upper median line parallel of the down fork.
Next price breaks out of the down fork to the up side, taking out two minor highs, but actually making little progress.
This is when it tends to return to the upper median line to find support, where there was resistance.
And so it does. Now, what we've been watching here is an example of a "spring being compressed". By a "spring" I don't mean a season, of course, but a mechanical coiled, steel device that stores energy.
At some point the spring can't be compressed any more and here we're slowly approaching that point. When the spring is released though, the next thing you know is the spring being back in its original shape (i.e., equilibrium length). It simply pushes back obeying Hooke's law, which states that the force with which the spring pushes back is linearly proportional to the distance from its equilibrium length.
So, the larger the distance and direction the spring is deformed from its equilibrium length, the greater the resulting force vector, ie., the greater the magnitude and direction of the restoring force the spring exerts. I hope it's clear that what it means for us here is that the longer the energy coil lasts and the deeper the correction goes, the stronger the reactive rally is going to be.
And quite often it works in a way that the longer the trading range continues and the harder the price is being pressed down, the stronger the prospective rally is going to be.
And in our case the process repeated itself again and again.
As you can see now, it turned out that it was worth staying long in this market. But what was the key factor that should make you hold on to your bullish view?
OK. Here is a bonus for you. There are two of them that I find salient, but let's look at one few of them in more detail. The first one was already mentioned. It is a specific in this case level - a handle of 1.8 - an objective support level, clear for everyone to see with no closes below it.
However, the second one I've kept hidden from view so far. It is the rule of halves (1/2 or 50%) and doubles (2 or 200%). What is it all about?
Price tends to respect the 50% retracement and develop twice as much as it did in the range before. Look how the range at the up side doubled to the down side.
Notice that price found support at 50% retracement of the trend contained by the purple fork.
Also notice some other examples of price following this rule. First at the top formation.
During the trend resumption.
And in the next stage of this trend.
And also later on, when price continued to develop in a horizontal trend.I hope you found this information useful.
Good luck in your trading!
-----------
Disclaimer:
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading forex. I assume no responsibility or liability for any trading or investment results. My posted statements and charts may unintentionally include inaccuracies. All content posted is for educational purposes only and is not a financial advice. The presented set-ups are not solicitations of any order to buy or sell. Rather, you should use the information only as a starting point for doing additional independent research, your own due diligence, in order to allow you to form your own opinion regarding trading decisions. No assumption should be made in relation to the performance or accuracy of the methods shown. No claims are made as to the success or profitability of any of my posts.